Parosphromenus paludicola Copyright Dr. J. Schmidt

Tweedie 1952

First descrip­tion: M.W.F. Tweedei 1952: Notes on Malayan fresh-​water fishes.3. The anan­ban­toid fishes.4. Some new and inter­est­ing records. 5. Malay names. Bul­letin of the Raf­fles Museum, 24:6395.

Char­ac­ter­is­tics: unusual species of the Parosphromenus genus, but the dif­fer­ences still do not jus­tify a split. It has basi­cally a safe species sta­tus because of the par­tic­u­lar struc­tural char­ac­ter­is­tics. At least one well-​known local form (“Wakaf Tapei”) exists, which is prob­a­bly a sub­species, or at least a sub-​species; even­tu­ally may even be con­sid­ered a sep­a­rate species (see below).

The fish appear to be more elon­gated than most other Parosphromenus, which is also con­firmed in the fin struc­ture: dor­sal XVIIXIX, 57, total 2225, anal XIII-​XVI, 69, total 2123. This dif­fer­en­ti­ates it from all other known licorice gouramis, even from those with a long dor­sal fin (espe­cially P.quindecim, but also P.deissneri and P.filamentosus). Fur­ther­more, the almost com­plete absence of flu­o­res­cent col­ors in the unpaired fins is a unique char­ac­ter­is­tic. Only in some forms does the anal fin show flu­o­res­cent pat­terns, but never light bands, as in many other species. Because of the dif­fer­ent body and fin struc­ture, females are eas­ily dis­tin­guished from the females of other licorice gouramis, a unique fea­ture in this group. In some pop­u­la­tions all or many ani­mals dis­play a black­ish lat­eral body spot that has been men­tioned in the orig­i­nal descrip­tion, too. But often the spot is miss­ing. The courtship colour of the female is not so extremely pale beige-​yellow in most of the local forms, as it is the case for many other species. The form of Wakaf Tapei shows the unique fea­ture that the female in courtship is rather dark, some will even become black­ish. This could be at least be a sub-​species indi­ca­tor, per­haps even (as J. Vierke says) an indi­ca­tor for an own species sta­tus. I sus­pect that this might be an ongo­ing species form­ing process.

Sim­i­lar species: because of the dif­fer­ent coloura­tion, the more stream­lined body shape and the unique fin struc­ture, com­pared to all other licorice gourami species, the risk of con­fu­sion is low, prac­ti­cally the low­est of the whole genus. Within the struc­tural band­width of char­ac­ter­is­tics, this species is very vari­able, espe­cially the males. Most of the fish show pas­tel colours in vary­ing degrees, but also fish occur , with beige-​brown, bluish-​pink, or brown-​red or almost entirely red colour. Fur­ther­more fish of most pop­u­la­tions are elon­gated and thin, while oth­ers appear com­pact with higher backs. The ven­tral fins of all males have very long fil­a­ments. The cau­dal fins of some males are also oval or tri­an­gu­lar elon­gated with sev­eral fil­a­ments, while oth­ers are more rounded with just one mid­dle fil­a­ment ray (e.g. Wakaf Tapei).

Occur­rence /​Dis­tri­b­u­tion: very large extended dis­tri­b­u­tion in the north-​east of the Malaysian penin­sula (province Tereng­ganu), occur­ing even in south­ern Thai­land as the only licorice gourami species. Within this dis­tri­b­u­tion area today many more or less iso­lated dif­fer­ently coloured sub pop­u­la­tions occur, some of them have already been imported pri­vately or com­mer­cially (e.g. from Tereng­ganu, Mer­chang, Kota Bharu, Wakaf Tapei, “south­ern Thai­land”, and oth­ers). They should not be mixed. The almost total absence of light colours in this unusual species shows that its cen­tre of dis­tri­b­u­tion is not sit­u­ated in black water. Like other Parosphromenus some of their local vari­ants inhabit black water habi­tats as well, but oppo­site to almost all other Parosphromenus forms, they live in clear water, too (but mainly in tran­si­tional areas). They pre­fer lighter biotopes, com­pared to other species of the genus: their adapt­abil­ity to man-​made water bod­ies (road­side chan­nels, reser­voirs, pond-​like struc­tures) is much higher. For a col­lec­tion by D. Armitage Den­nis Young men­tioned they mainly came from Paper Bark (melaleuca) swamps.

Threat: lower, com­pared to other licorice gouramis, due to their dif­fer­ent habi­tat require­ments, but still sig­nif­i­cant, because of the gen­eral ongo­ing destruc­tion of nat­ural waters. For some colour vari­ants or local forms the threat is high, because of the lim­ited range of dis­tri­b­u­tion. Large areas of the orig­i­nal biotopes are no longer hab­it­able for the species with fur­ther decreas­ing trend for avail­able habi­tats. D. Young states that the orig­i­nal Wakaf Tapei local­ity has been destroyed in the meantime.

Discovery/​First import: P. palu­di­cola was the sec­ond form after ‘deiss­neri’ recog­nised clearly as a dis­tinct species due to its struc­tural pecu­liar­i­ties. It was dis­cov­ered only around 1950 in Tereng­ganu by the cura­tor of the Raf­fles Museum, M.W.F. Tweedei and got its first descrip­tion in 1952. The fish then remained unno­ticed for many years and was not caught again, so that the for­mer aquar­ium lit­er­a­ture did not men­tion it or included only rough draw­ings and con­clu­sions. In 1977 it was imported by Peter Nagyi de Felsö Gör (Salzburg) to Europe for the first time. The species was also bred for the first time then.<

Trade: before the nineties, the species had obvi­ously never been traded com­mer­cially. Since then sev­eral imports to Cen­tral or West­ern Europe have taken place, but in most of the cases under the wrong name “deiss­neri”. P. palu­di­cola is very rarely traded. The sig­nif­i­cantly dif­fer­ent (from the nom­i­nate form) local vari­ant Wakaf Tapei has been caught pri­vately by B. and A. Brown in the early 80s and again by Young, Pinto and Arnitage in 1996, where it has been bred suc­cess­fully by Brown. In the com­mer­cial trade it has not appeared. The whole cur­rent aquar­ium stock goes back to the breed­ing pop­u­la­tion of the Browns.

Care /​Breed­ing: Usu­ally one of the least demand­ing licorice gouramis, because it is not nec­es­sar­ily depen­dent on the sim­u­la­tion of pure black water con­di­tions. The species is there­fore (together with P. fil­a­men­to­sus or P. linkei) par­tic­u­larly well suited for begin­ners in the licorice gourami aquar­ium hobby. The con­duc­tiv­ity of the water should be less than 100 micro Siemens /​cm, a value between 30 and 50 is con­sid­ered ideal. The pH value can range between 4.0 and 6.5, the height of the value is not cru­cial, but a low value can be use­ful for its antibi­otic effect. The addi­tion of humic sub­stances or humic acid-​emerging mate­r­ial is also help­ful. That the species is not found in pure black water, does not mean that humic sub­stances can be dis­pensed entirely. P. palu­di­cola clutches may be among the largest in the genus (up to 100 eggs). A bub­ble nest is built, but often it remains rudi­men­tary. The vari­ant form of Wakaf Tapei is less pro­duc­tive and appar­ently some­what more del­i­cate than the other forms.

Behav­iour /​Par­tic­u­lar­i­ties: hor­i­zon­tal courtship. The dif­fer­ences between nup­tial and ordi­nary colour are less dis­tinct then in any other licorice gourami species but nev­er­the­less exists: the hor­i­zon­tal bands of the ordi­nary colour­ing dis­ap­pear almost com­pletely dur­ing courtship. The “sexy-​eyes” of the females are par­tic­u­larly pro­nounced. Caves on the floor, halfway up or at the water sur­face are accepted, if they are not too small or too spa­cious. Film con­tain­ers are already suf­fi­cient. P. Finke once observed a rudi­men­tary brood care by the female after the death of the male, but it was not com­pleted. To keep this species together with other fish is more eas­ily pos­si­ble, than with other Parosphromenus, due to its less spe­cialised demands. Even a com­mu­nity with other licorice gourami species is not prob­lem­atic, because even males in non breed­ing con­di­tion and females can eas­ily be dis­tin­guished due to their struc­tural char­ac­ter­is­tics. Addi­tion­ally the less extreme water val­ues do not con­spire against this. How­ever, only small and peace­ful other fish can be con­sid­ered for com­pan­ion­ship and suc­cess­ful rais­ing of fry can not be expected.

Lit­er­a­ture (selection):

P.Finke 2005: Erfahrun­gen mit Parosphromenus palu­di­cola. Der Makropode 56 (2006): 101104

H.-J. May­land 1980: Labyrinth­fis­che. Min­den (Philler) 1980, darin S. 109110

P. Nagy 1979 : Ein aquar­is­tis­ches Loch — Parosphromenus palu­di­cola

Aquar­ien­magazin 13: 567571

P. Nagy 1980: Erste Zuchter­folge mit dem Labyrinthfisch Parosphromenus palu­di­cola. Das Aquar­ium 135: 459463

H. Pin­ter 1984: Labyrinth­fis­che, Hechtköpfe und Schlangenkopff­is­che. Stuttgart (Ulmer) 1984, darin S. 128.

H.-J. Richter 1979: Das Buch der Labyrinth­fis­che. Berlin-​Basel-​Wien (Neumann-​Neudamm) 1979, darin S. 82.

J. Vierke 1978: Labyrinth­fis­che und ver­wandte Arten. Wup­per­tal (Pfriem) 1978, darin S. 84.



Parosphromenus paludicola 'Paka' male Copyright C.HinzParosphromenus paludicola Copyright C.HinzParosphromenus paludicola Copyright SchmidtParosphromenus paludicola habitat Copyright Mohd Illam Norhakim LokmanParosphromenus paludicola habitat Copyright Mohd Illam Norhakim LokmanParosphromenus paludicola habitat Copyright Mohd Illam Norhakim LokmanParosphromenus paludicola habitat Copyright Mohd Illam Norhakim LokmanBiotope of Parosphromenus paludicola 'Paka' Copyright C. HinzBiotop of Parosphromenus paludicola *Paka' Copyright C. Hinz

Users online


Right Click is Disabled

Please respect our image usage rights and do not copy the images found on this web­site with­out prior per­mis­sion. Thank You — The Parosphromenus Project Staff