An idea.

[helene schoubye]

Hi there.

Thank you for your input, I think its always great to have feedback on what we are doing. What I think is that the current structure is one which we decided at the start of the homepage, – and of course we have it as a goal to evaluate this structure after a certain time. This we would likely do at one of the annual meetings of the steering group.
We have now had this structure for a good amount of time, and it seems natural for me that we would evaluate it some time soon. It makes also sense to look at how the structure actually has been used up to now, – some categories seems not to be very used, others makes really good sense.

Your input, as well as others, if there are more, is very welcome.

The way I see it it would not make sense to ‘separate’ things out in the project and the fish. This homepage is The project – around the fish 🙂 ..
There are other forums, homepages where you would find species categories, – also parosphromenus categories as such, – but here I think it should not be separated. Its all about the Parosphromenus project bacicly.

I must say, I also do think that having categories on the single species will not work, – most of the time the conditions, problems, behaviour etc really does not differ between the species, – the difference mostly is around identification. We would end up having ’empty’ categories here as well, I am sure.

. There are some photos in the “pictures” but for some reason most of them are in other places, which is extremely annoying. There is little movement around this forum, and I think it is mostly due to a bit chaotic fragmentation.

– I am not sure I understand what you mean by this ?

But I do think you have a point in perhaps looking at evaluating the current structure and see if what we started out with is serving the purpose we intended 🙂

[Author]

Posts